Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mika's avatar

Hi, I read your blog and the attached articles and reviewed the data in both. I am concerned that the data is skewed and presents an inaccurate and inconsistent image of what "chronic absence" means. "10 days" or "10%" (about 18) of total days? Are these excused absences that are still being counted as absences?

The race demographics also create the potential to inflate the numbers by counting Hispanic students as a separate category, but then not distinguishing, "non-hispanic" when listing other groups.

The article also doesn't seem to acknowledge the possibility of homeschooling nor does it account for the fact that sometimes students move and the records system is quite slow to update.

These are not reasons to remove funding from the DOE, they are reasons to increase it so that it can serve the city and students all across the country more efficiently.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts